Environmental Air Technology
A Division of Filter Specialists, Inc.
10922 J Street
Tel: 402-339-3716
FAX: 402-339-5422
Email:
info@environmentalairtech.com
Ambient Capture
System vs. Source Capture System
An ambient air cleaning system is a highly effective
method of capturing air contaminants without requiring hoods, ductwork, arms
or other source capture devices.
Micro-Air®
MC3000
Sample Ambient Capture System
Unit shown with source capture plenum
Ambient System Air Volume Total 19,800 Cfm with system
total of 6,000 sq. ft. of filter media; System equipped with four (4)
Micro-Air® Model MC3000 cartridge units each equipped with four (4) high
efficiency, fire retardant cartridge filters, 5 Hp. 208/230/460 volt, three
phase blowers providing 3,300 Cfm, motor starter and overload protectors,
built in silencer, Patented Roto-Pulse™ filter cleaning system, washable
spark arrestor prefilters and choice of high capacity hopper or dust tray.
Cost per Cfm = $1.94/per Cfm
Advantages
Takes zero floor space
Includes built-in silencers and
operates at lower noise levels than a central system.
Overload circuitry protection
included in pricing.
Much better smoke collection
Requires NO operator input and can
not be disabled or not used like the arms
Much less prone to damage from
misuse or abuse
Built in Spark Arrestors.
If operations are moved simply move
the air cleaner along with them.
Clean air exhaust actually acts to
keep stagnated air circulated and filtered, helping the overall air
quality of the plant.
Each MC3000 unit captures the
ambient air contaminants, removes them, and exhausts the contaminant
free air toward the next consecutive air purifier in the pattern.
If one unit has a problem, the
others are still working.
Filter replacements can be
staggered into bi-monthly increments, keeping budgetary constraints in
check.
If for some reason, an individual
unit needs to be shut down, it can be done without affecting the entire
air cleaning system.
Lower installation and annual
operating costs.
Absolutely no weather related
problems: freezing, icing, condensation, etc.
Disadvantages
Six (6) electrical drops vs. 1.
Six (6) places to change filters.
Twenty-four (24) cartridge filters
to change.
Sample Source Capture System
Sample System Air Volume Total of 9,000 Cfm; Unit
equipped with sixteen (16) fire retardant cartridge filters totaling over
4,000 Sq. ft. of media, blower, and Roto-Pulse™ filter cleaning system,
noise attenuator, SCA source capture arms, and QF Quick-Fit ductwork. Cost
per Cfm= $4.66/ per Cfm
Advantages
Located in central location for
filter change-out or any other maintenance.
Source capture arms capture
virtually all air contaminants being produced provided the arms are
properly positioned.
All dust disposal is in one
location. This can also be a disadvantage because the system needs to be
shut down to empty the barrels.
Disadvantages
Entire system must be shut down if
any problems arise.
Source capture arm must be properly
positioned to capture air contaminants. Arms need to be within 24” from
weld.
Requires ductwork, i.e. more up
front cost on the equipment side.
Cost of energy consumed is much
more on the larger single fan than that of several smaller fans
producing the same CFM.
If floor space is at a premium as
it is in most manufacturing facilities, the RP units take up 28 square
feet.
Overloads and Starters need to be
purchased separately.
If operations are moved, more than
likely, the ductwork has to be rearranged, possibly requiring further
expenditures and definitely requiring the hassle of re-balancing air
flow throughout the entire system.
Filters must all be changed at one
time and can put a strain on that month’s budget.
If one person or department is
working overtime, the entire system must be running, decreasing overall
filter life and increasing energy costs.
Much higher system costs, up–front
and annual.
Much more prone to valve freezing,
condensation build-up, frost and icing problems due to moisture in the
air.